Latest Entries »

I am really confused. I hear a bunch of Americans, who boast about being Americans, acting in a most un-American way. How many of you have read our founding documents? How many of you have a clue regarding what was said… here, let’s see if these words mean anything to you, (Hint: You may have seen them before, but never understood what they meant).

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” (emphasis added)

That, of course was from the Declaration of Independence. Go back and re-read it and ask yourself, are you free to pursue Life, Liberty (or rather Freedom), and Happiness? Or is everything you want to do regulated, and taxed 19 ways to hell?

The founders realized that government/politics invited fraud and corruption, and over time could (and has) become oppressive and imperialistic, not only globally, but TPTB want to own everything in America, including us. They are unlawfully, and un-Constitutionally grabbing up land which they are not allowed to own, as per said Constitution.

Here are some more supporting documents you, as an American, should read and know:

  1. The Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776
  2. The Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777
  3. Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787
  4. Constitution of September 17, 1787

While you’re at it, go here and get a copy of Black’s Law 1st Edition, to understand what the words in those documents meant at the time they were written.

Now, on to Burns…

The U.S. Inc, our false government stopped listening to, and working for us a long time ago. They have been assuming powers that they were never granted, using “supposed” federal agencies (which are all private corporations), as their brute squads. Even the U.S. Treasury is a corporation, and guess what…? We, as the major creditors don’t own it, nor any of its stock. And they hide all of this in plain site, and never teach it in the American Fool System (another private corporation, or rather string of franchises).

Then we mix in the Main Stream Media (MSM), who immediately start labeling the protesters as terrorists. Hey, they’re Americans occupying a currently unused “PUBLIC BUILDING.” That means that they are part owners. And what’s even more amusing is that the federal government has no jurisdiction there. Read the Law, and I don’t mean just legalese “color of law.” They truly have no jurisdiction.

But you see, what the PTB really want is a civil war. They keep pushing more and more Americans to the point of desperate action, and they are waiting for us to fire the first shot. Then they can go to town.

But, if they fire the first shot, then they have declared war on the People of the united “Sovereign” States of America, of which D.C. is not a part. D.C. is a totally separate foreign sovereign nation/state, just like the Vatican and City of London. They are then a rogue nation, and we have every right to fight back.

Understand, I am not against the Republic form of government that our Constitution dictates, so in that sense, I am not anti-government. What I am is anti-corruption, anti-fraud, anti-theft, anti-murder, all crimes that the United States, Inc. engages in on a daily basis, and we’re the victims.

So, to conclude, I agree with the protesters, but I would hate to see the government fire the first shot at these brave and patriotic people. If you understand the message and meanings of the founders, you would see that these people are acting like Americans, while our government is committing acts of treason.

You may disagree if you wish, and that is fine, (it is a free country, right?), but it isn’t going to cause me to back down in the slightest in this matter, because I too have the right to my own opinion.

Advertisements

Just All Turned Around

I have been mulling over how to even begin this, since there are so many things I need to express, and only two hands and one brain.

I have spent most of my life operating under two principles:

  1. You live and you learn… or you don’t live long, and
  2. Specialization is for insects.

Both of those came from the same source, a science fiction writer.

A lot of people discount “scifi” as fantasy and dreams. The funny thing is the ideas these writers come up with are not all created out of thin air. Many are based on sound scientific principles that just haven’t been released to the public yet, mostly for monetary reasons.

One man’s  magic is another man’s science

In 65 years, I have learned enough to stay alive to this point, but I couldn’t just stop at that. A long time ago, I made a promise to myself that I would learn at least one new thing everyday. But being the double type “A” personality that I have been most of my life, I couldn’t even leave it at that.

I would get on search engines, pick a random topic, and research the hell out of the topic. Over time, some of those topics drew me in more than others.

Way back in the late 60’s, I started realizing that things weren’t really right with the way our country was going, and the way it was being run. I started finding the actual reasons for, and beneficiaries of war. This was after I had enlisted in and served in the Navy. I was not happy.

War Never Benefits the Soldiers, Nor the People… Only the Bankers and Leaders

Then, I realized that our own government wasn’t our only major enemy. I discovered the world of Big Pharma, and the American Medical Association/FDA. All private corporations with the FDA masquerading as a government agency, DUN number, corporate charters and all.

And yet another major player is Big Agra. All of our food is in their hands, unless it was grown locally and organically. There have been many attempts to put organic farmers out of business. They have made growing food on your own property illegal. There are companies like Monsanto (Insanto), and Syngenta, that are taking our food and turning it into poisons, that even poison the soil they grow in, along with the added poisons the farmers(?) add. And people eat this stuff, which makes them sick, sending them to the other partners mentioned above.

The more I learned, the madder I got and was bound and determined to get as much information as I could out to all those I cared about, which is a lot of people. I would get flak about my efforts on Facebook, but during my time there, I watched many people wake up and start looking at things on their own. They started to realize that I was not, and am not just some doped-up-tin-foil-hat-wearing-conspiracy-theory-loon. There was substance to what I was presenting, and a few times I was wrong, and admitted it.

The real rub for me was presenting credible evidence, like FOIA released government documents confirming the conspiracies, and people not going to find out if they were there and available, but attacking me personally. But I put up with it, because I felt what I was doing was important. Many times people would message me, or comment, thanking me for providing useful information. Of course, now that battlefield is closed.

It is getting late, and this is a long story, so I think I will leave this as an introduction to who I am. I am working to get myself into the mode of using this venue. I am working to be more prolific, so be patient, please.

Namaste, My Friends

The Blue Wizard

Post Facebook Departum Recovery

Well My Friends, and those yet to be friends, I am glad you found me here.

For several years, I have been gathering information, researching said info, and sharing what I thought was important for people to know, things like

  • What real Law (Natural Law) is, and how a foreign corporation, in an independent nation/state has high-jacked our country. How they created a whole new form of corporate citizenship (inadvertent employees subject to their corporate policies; financial slaves). How they created an un-Constitutional “income tax,” that is only for those engaged in government business, or gaining from industries serving said government; a voluntary tax for American National Sovereigns, but they have been taught is their duty through threat, duress, and coercion. They lied to us… and still are.
  • Things like our food industries and our nutrition. Taking on Insanto and other chemical/ toxin/and other poisonous products they try to convince us is no different from Nature’s organically grown, non-genetically modified original, well, what our ancestors called FOOD.
  • Taking on Big Pharma, with their statement that “only a drug can cure a dis-ease,” when we know that they are a global industry or corporations, who’s goals are not to actually “cure” people. There is no long-term profit in cures. They provide poisons that “treat the symptoms” of a disease,but never attack the root cause. Then, their treatments have side effects, which they just happen to have a fix for, but wait, those come with more side-effects, so here comes another pill. The net result is not healing and curing, but creating life-long profit streams for the pharmaceutical companies.
  • Politics is such an obvious and HUGE target. In actuality, it is quite easy to follow… always follow the money, power, and control. Our American politicians are all owned by someone with a huge bankroll, as is every other politician on the planet. I have set my sights on their masters, especially the international central gang-banksters. (He/she who has the gold makes the rules (for now, that is crumbling)).
  • For now, last, but certainly not least, is Natural Cures. Creator has put some amazing plants and herbs on this planet, and just looking back at what has been learned and used effectively over the last 3000 years, in every culture globally, cannot be disregarded off-hand as anecdotal as modern science is so eager to do. Again, it cuts into their profits, since you can’t patent a natural plant. Just a part-time study on the uses of medicinal herbs and plants should open many questions in you mind.

In doing those things I listed above, it seems that I got to someone who wasn’t going to let me continue until such time as they could find out who was rattin’ on them.

I am a bit bummed that I did not get a chance to let all my Nazibook friends/followers know what happened, but rest assured, I was not black-bagged, nor suicided, nor have I died under mysterious circumstances. If that were to happen, it has been arranged to get the story out into the net in a BIG way because I certainly have no reason or desire to end this battle I have undertaken, and I still have a bunch of stage performances left under my belt once my lungs heal up from my current “setback.”

 

My love to you all. Since you are in my life, you are VERY special to me. NAMASTE

 

Stash

The Blue Wizard

I cannot keep track of the number of times people have said that to me.And if I did, would they really read it?

For some reason, people seem to think I have lead a particularly interesting and maybe even “glamorous (HAH!)’ life. And perhaps from their perspective, I have, considering the lives of some people I have met. Using the term “hum-drum” would lend too much excitement to their story.

I have done many different things, and that was intentional. Being an avid science fiction fan, I read voraciously. One day, I cam upon a book. I had been reading several books by Robert Heinlein. Stranger in a Strange Land hooked me, so original.

But then I found “Time Enough for Love.” The story takes place 2400 years in the future, about a man born in 1946, I believe. Throughout his 2400 years he experiences just about everything there is to do. Throughout the book there are little pearls of wisdom cast out dubbed “The sayings of Lazarus Long.”

One particular little ditty resonated with me…

“A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.” – Robert Heinlein

Why not? If I really want to do it, why shouldn’t I?

I guess the thing that interests most people is all the time I have spent in the Entertainment and Music Industry. I have done a lot. But, contrary to most folk’s belief, it is NOT a glamorous life.

What they See

Most concert-goers arrive about the time the doors open and shuffle to their seats  and maybe get some concessions, and the lights dim, the show starts, the show runs, the crowd is on their feet, and then the crowd shuffles off to a bar, or an after-hours party, and talk about the show, then go home and do what ever they do. Three hours outside their normal realities in a world of smoke and mirrors where they can forget their troubles and get lost in a fantasy. That’s show biz.

What Actually Happens

At the arena:

7:30 AM -30-50 stagehands arrive as 6-12 Semi tractor trailers and crew tour buses fill the parking lot. Hopefully coffee and donuts are waiting, sometimes, even a breakfast.

5:00 AM House stage building crew begins assembly of modular stage, unless in the case of Metallica, they bring in their own stage in the round on a couple of giant flat-beds.

8:00 AM – the first door on the first truck opens and out comes all the extra-heavy rigging hardware for hanging the lighting and sound rigs. Riggers are in the ceiling pulling up winch chains. In the mean time, all the truss pieces the lights hang on have to be un-stacked, assembled, double checked and then the lights get hung on them. Keep in mind that this is all done in less than two hours.

11:00 AM Staging. All of the props, risers, video screens, stair cases/ramps, special effects, pyro, etc. All the little details that make the show happen. Interspersed with all of it is the band gear, in many cases hidden. Smoke and mirrors. Sound and lighting stations are set up in audience, snakes run/covered (OSHA).

12:00 PM LUNCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1:00 PM  Barriers are set in front of the stage with a pit for the security personnel.

1:00 PM lighting focusing, Sound tweaking for the house. Empty cases are stored, final stage dressings and details are attended to.

2:00 – Whenever – Sound check. I say whenever, since it isn’t finished until all the prima donnas are satisfied. It can be an arduous and tedious process.

Now, for many of the crew their service isn’t needed until after the show, so the are cut until load-out call. Many just hang around for the show, expecially if they aren’t in their home town.

There are jobs during the show that require extra hands beyond the road crew, so several of the more experienced hands tend to be kept for the show.

So, here it is, show time… See above “What they see.” Over two hours of fun and excitement, spending money, cheering with friends, getting drunk. I am happy you enjoyed yourself… last night. This morning it’s now quite so fun.

Guess what. While you went to the bar to finish knocking yourself out, Approximately 80 of us were packing away band gear, we were folding up and crating staging, we were dropping sound systems and loading them into trucks. We were lowering and disassembling lighting rigs, and storing fixtures, then getting them on the rucks. Others were putting away several hundred chairs that just happened to be there for you when you walked in.

Others are coming along behind cleaning up the disgusting rizz left on the floor but thousands of people.

So, somewhere around 3-4:00 AM, the last door is closed on the last truck, which then heads of to the next city to do the same thing all over again.

So, the next time you take a show for granted, think about what went into it. And remember, I didn’t even touch on the hours/years/decades put in by the performers. How much is your time doing your job worth yo you?

I will be getting more into sharing my stories, and it will be up to you as to whether it is worth writing this disjointed book.

Namaste

12/19/2015

 

 

The End of Facebook (Nazibook)

They finally went and did it. Facebook has taken a step over the line with me. I have, for yearsnow, been operating on FB as “Stash,” or “Stash Beaverton,” and have almost 3000 friends/followers, and many of those followed me daily, and thanked me for all the help I have been able to provide.

Well, today, they informed me that my account is blocked and wiped from FB until I provide them with a photo (gov’t) ID to prove that my name, Stash, is how the world commonly recognizes me. Guess I am gong to have to create my own Sovereign picture ID using Stash. The law says I can lawfully use any name I choose as long as it’s is not for the purpose of fraud. Facebook seems to have come to the belief that they are above the law.

So, for those that come to me for knowledge or advice, well, you will have to find me on Seen.is, a private social network based in Iceland, with no ties to U.S. intelligence services, nor any lawful duty to answer to them or provide any user information to the U.S.

So, now we see what happens to shit-disturbers who actually start having people listen to them. That is my only logical assumption, that I got under the skin of one of TPTB, and they decided to push back. Much to their chagrin, there are a veritable plethora of other avenues to sneak up and count coup on them. Time for me to get back into guerrilla warfare shit-disturbing.

I will NOT quit, and they can only provide temporary obstacles for this obnoxious, opinionated SOB they call Stash. I will never sit idly by and watch wrongs done without if not just saying something about it, but taking action to remedy it.

 

Later on down the road, My friends. The Unmasked shit-disturber rides again.

 

Legal Big List

I started collecting a bunch of laws and court citations for use in any court documents that I may have to construct, and have been calling it my Legal Big List.

I figured I would just share it here, so you may have it as a reference. It covers several areas. Hope it helps.

CONSTITUTION AND RIGHTS

Obsta principiis – Resist the beginnings. Nip it in the bud

USC 18 §2382 – Misprision of treason Whoever having knowledge of treason, conceals and does not make known the same to some judge is guilty of treason for contempt against the sovereign and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

USC 18 §201 BRIBERY – of any public official directly or indirectly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person to influence any official act

USC 18 §241; CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS: If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State in the free exercise or
enjoyment of any right they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both

USC 18 §242; DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW: Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any
person in any State the deprivation of any rights shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both;

USC 18 §2071: Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, documents filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court, shall be fined or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

USC 18 §2076: CLERK IS TO FILE: Whoever, being a clerk willfully refuses or neglects to make or forward any report, certificate, statement, or document as required by law, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

USC 42 §1983; CIVIL ACTION FOR DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State
subjects, or causes to be subjected, any person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws,
shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law.

USC 42 1985; CONSPIRACY TO INTERFERE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS: If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire for the purpose of depriving, either directly
or indirectly any persons rights the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages against any one or more of the conspirators.

USC 42 §1986 – ACTION FOR NEGLECT TO PREVENT: Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done or are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured.

“…, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent.” — Cruden v.
Neale, 2 N.C. 338 May Term 1796.

In Hertado v. California, 110 US 516, the U.S Supreme Court states very plainly: “The state cannot diminish rights of the people.”

And in Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60, “Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of common right and common reason are null and void.”

“The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local practice.” Davis v. Wechsler, 263 US 22, at 24

“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491.

“The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.” Miller v. US, 230 F 486, at 489.

There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional rights.” Sherer v. Cullen, 481 F 946

Article Six of the U.S. Constitution:

“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof;…shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or laws of any State to the Contrary not one word withstanding.”

“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution…”

Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property…and is regarded as UNALIENABLE.” 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987.

Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property…and is regarded as UNALIENABLE.” 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987.

“The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and the name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.”16th American Jurisprudence 2d, Section 177, late 2nd, Section 256

An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no right; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” Norton vs Shelby County118 US 425 p.442

“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.”
– Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491.

“The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.· – Miller v. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489.

“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional rights.”- Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945. ( There is no question that a citation/ticket issued by a police officer, for no drivers license, no current vehicle registration, no vehicle insurance etc. which carries a fine or jail time, is a penalty or sanction, and is indeed “converting a Right into a crime”.)

CITIZENSHIP

“It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation, Elected and public employees and arrest code breakers.” (Sapp v. Tallahasee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff v. City of Philadelphia 477 F.Supp. 1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 ENFORCEMENT OF CITY/COUNTY CODES PROHIBITED. California Law prohibits Cities and Counties from enforcing City or County Codes and Ordinances
There is a clear distinction between national and State citizenship, U.S. citizenship does not entitle citizen of the privileges and Immunities of the Citizen of the State. K. Tashiro v. Jordan, 256 P 545, affirmed 49 S Ct 47, 278 US 123

Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Edition, agrees with the distinction between these different classes of (C)itizenship:  There are two Privileges and Immunities Clauses in the federal Constitution and Amendments, the first being found in Art. IV, and the second in the 14th Amendment. Section 1, second sentence, clause 1. The provision in Art. IV states that “The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States, while the 14th Amendment provides that “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.

Chief Justice Taney in Dred Scott v. Stanford, 19 How. 393, 422, in defining the term “persons” the Judge stated:

……persons who are not recognized as Citizens,”. See also American and Ocean Ins. Co. V. Canter, 1 Pet. 511, which also distinguishes “persons” and “Citizens.” These were the persons that were the object of the 14th Amendment, to give to this class of native born “persons” who were “resident” in the union of the United States citizenship, and authority to place other than the white race within the special category of”citizen of the United States.”

This was the intent of Congress; not to infringe upon the Constitution or the state of the de jure Citizens of the several states. It was never the intent of the 14th Amendment to subvert the States’ authority or that of the Constitution as it relates to the status of the de jure State Citizens. People v. Washington, 36 C 658, 661 (1869) over ruled on other grounds; French v. Barber, 181 US 324; MacKenzie v. Hare, 60 L Ed 297

______________________________________________________________________________

USC

Title 18: USC ss 921:

(a) As used in this chapter—
(1) The term “person” and the term “whoever” include any individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, or joint stock company.

Source: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/921

________________________________________________________________________________________

Income Tax

McLaughlin v. CIR, 832 F.2d 986, 987 (7th Cir. 1987)(“The notion that the federal income tax is contractual or otherwise consensual in nature is not only utterly without foundation but… has been repeatedly rejected by the courts.”)

___________________________________________________________________________________________

LAW

Rule 26(b) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense — including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any documents or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons who know of any discoverable matter. For good cause, the court may order discovery of any matter relevant to the subject matter involved in the action.”

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Travel

CASE #1: “The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived.” Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 NE 221.

CASE #2: “The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579.

CASE #3: “The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.” Kent v. Dulles, 357 US 116, 125.

CASE #4: “The right to travel is a well-established common right that does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right.” Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941.

“Even the legislature has no power to deny to a citizen the right to travel upon the highway and transport his property in the ordinary course of his business or pleasure, though this right may be regulated in accordance with the public interest and convenience. – Chicago Motor Coach v Chicago 169 NE 22
(“Regulated” here means traffic safety enforcement, stop lights, signs, etc. NOT a privilege that requires permission i.e.- licensing, mandatory insurance, vehicle registration, etc.)

“Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal Iiberty, and the right, ordinarily, of free transit from or through the territory of any State is a right secured by the l4th Amendment and by other provisions of the Constitution.” – Schactman v Dulles, 96 App D.C. 287, 293.

United States v. Drefke, 707 F.2d 978, 981 (8th Cir. 1983). Contentions that driver licenses are contracts are baseless; see Hershey v. Commonwealth Dep’t. of Transportation, 669 A.2d 517, 520 (Pa.Cmwlth. 1996); and State v. Gibson, 697 P.2d 1216 (Idaho 1985).

§ 801.208¹
Commercial motor vehicle
(1) Commercial motor vehicle means a motor vehicle or combination of motor vehicles and vehicles that:
(a) Has a gross combination weight rating of 26,001 pounds or more, inclusive of a towed unit or a combination of towed units, with a gross vehicle weight rating of more than 10,000 pounds;
(b) Has a gross vehicle weight rating of 26,001 pounds or more;
(c) Is designed to transport 16 or more persons, including the driver; or
(d) Is of any size and is used in the transportation of hazardous materials.
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, the term commercial motor vehicle does not include the following:
(a) An emergency fire vehicle being operated by firefighters as defined in ORS 652.050 (Definitions for ORS 652.050 to 652.080);
(b) Emergency vehicles being operated by qualified emergency service volunteers as defined in ORS 401.358 (Definitions);
(c) A motor home used to transport or house, for nonbusiness purposes, the operator or the operators family members or personal possessions; or
(d) A recreational vehicle that is operated solely for personal use. [1989 c.636 §2; 1991 c.185 §1; 1991 c.676 §1; 1999 c.359 §1; 2007 c.387 §1; 2009 c.395 §3; 2009 c.718 §27; 2011 c.470 §1]

§ 801.557¹
Traffic violation
Traffic violation means a traffic offense that is designated as a traffic violation in the statute defining the offense, or any other offense defined in the Oregon Vehicle Code that is punishable by a fine but that is not punishable by a term of imprisonment. Penalties for traffic violations are as provided for violations generally in ORS chapter 153. [Formerly 801.550; 2011 c.597 §95a]

Other U.S. court cases that confirm and point out the difference between the “right” of the citizen to travel and a government “privilege” are – Barney v Board of Railroad Commissioners; State v City of Spokane, 186 P. 864.; Ex Parte Dickey (Dickey v Davis), 85 S.E. 781.; Teche Lines v Danforth, 12 So.2d 784.

“The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horsedrawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.”

Thompson v.Smith, 154 SE 579, 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135 “The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business.” –

Thompson vs. Smith, supra.; Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss., 12 S.2d 784 “… the right of the citizen to drive on a public street with freedom from police interference… is a fundamental constitutional right” -White, 97 Cal.App.3d.141, 158 Cal.Rptr. 562, 566-67 (1979) “citizens have a right to drive upon the public streets of the District of Columbia or any other city absent a constitutionally sound reason for limiting their access.”

Caneisha Mills v. D.C. 2009 “The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the public highways partakes of the nature of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees. . .”
Berberian v. Lussier (1958) 139 A2d 869, 872, See also: Schecter v. Killingsworth, 380 P.2d 136, 140; 93 Ariz. 273 (1963). “The right to operate a motor vehicle [an automobile] upon the public streets and highways is not a mere privilege. It is a right of liberty, the enjoyment of which is protected by the guarantees of the federal and state constitutions.”

Adams v. City of Pocatello, 416 P.2d 46, 48; 91 Idaho 99 (1966). “A traveler has an equal right to employ an automobile as a means of transportation and to occupy the public highways with other vehicles in common use.”

Campbell v. Walker, 78 Atl. 601, 603, 2 Boyce (Del.) 41. “The owner of an automobile has the same right as the owner of other vehicles to use the highway,* * * A traveler on foot has the same right to the use of the public highways as an automobile or any other vehicle.”

Simeone v. Lindsay, 65 Atl. 778, 779; Hannigan v. Wright, 63 Atl. 234, 236. “The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts.” People v. Horton 14 Cal. App. 3rd 667 (1971) “The right to make use of an automobile as a vehicle of travel long the highways of the state, is no longer an open question. The owners thereof have the same rights in the roads and streets as the drivers of horses or those riding a bicycle or traveling in some other vehicle.”

House v. Cramer, 112 N.W. 3; 134 Iowa 374; Farnsworth v. Tampa Electric Co. 57 So. 233, 237, 62 Fla. 166. “The automobile may be used with safety to others users of the highway, and in its proper use upon the highways there is an equal right with the users of other vehicles properly upon the highways. The law recognizes such right of use upon general principles.

Brinkman v Pacholike, 84 N.E. 762, 764, 41 Ind. App. 662, 666. “The law does not denounce motor carriages, as such, on public ways. They have an equal right with other vehicles in common use to occupy the streets and roads. It is improper to say that the driver of the horse has rights in the roads superior to the driver of the automobile. Both have the right to use the easement.”

Indiana Springs Co. v. Brown, 165 Ind. 465, 468. U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 2 2 “A highway is a public way open and free to any one who has occasion to pass along it on foot or with any kind of vehicle.” Schlesinger v. City of Atlanta, 129 S.E. 861, 867, 161 Ga. 148, 159;

Holland v. Shackelford, 137 S.E. 2d 298, 304, 220 Ga. 104; Stavola v. Palmer, 73 A.2d 831, 838, 136 Conn. 670 “There can be no question of the right of automobile owners to occupy and use the public streets of cities, or highways in the rural districts.” Liebrecht v. Crandall, 126 N.W. 69, 110 Minn. 454, 456 “The word ‘automobile’ connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways.”

-American Mutual Liability Ins. Co., vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200 Motor Vehicle: 18 USC Part 1 Chapter 2 section 31 definitions: “(6) Motor vehicle. – The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways…” 10) The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit. “A motor vehicle or automobile for hire is a motor vehicle, other than an automobile stage, used for the transportation of persons for which remuneration is received.”

-International Motor Transit Co. vs. Seattle, 251 P. 120 The term ‘motor vehicle’ is different and broader than the word ‘automobile.’”

-City of Dayton vs. DeBrosse, 23 NE.2d 647, 650; 62 Ohio App. 232 “Thus self-driven vehicles are classified according to the use to which they are put rather than according to the means by which they are propelled” – Ex Parte Hoffert, 148 NW 20 ”

The Supreme Court, in Arthur v. Morgan, 112 U.S. 495, 5 S.Ct. 241, 28 L.Ed. 825, held that carriages were properly classified as household effects, and we see no reason that automobiles should not be similarly disposed of.”

Hillhouse v United States, 152 F. 163, 164 (2nd Cir. 1907). “…a citizen has the right to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon…” State vs. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; Cummins vs. Homes, 155 P. 171; Packard vs. Banton, 44 S.Ct. 256; Hadfield vs. Lundin, 98 Wash 516, Willis vs. Buck, 263 P. l 982;

Barney vs. Board of Railroad Commissioners, 17 P.2d 82 “The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental Right of which the public and the individual cannot be rightfully deprived.”

Chicago Motor Coach vs. Chicago, 169 NE 22; Ligare vs. Chicago, 28 NE 934; Boon vs. Clark, 214 SSW 607; 25 Am.Jur. (1st) Highways Sect.163 “the right of the Citizen to travel upon the highway and to transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business… is the usual and ordinary right of the Citizen, a right common to all.” –

Ex Parte Dickey, (Dickey vs. Davis), 85 SE 781 “Every Citizen has an unalienable RIGHT to make use of the public highways of the state; every Citizen has full freedom to travel from place to place in the enjoyment of life and liberty.” People v. Nothaus, 147 Colo. 210. “No State government entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, nor waterways… transporting his vehicles and personal property for either recreation or business, but by being subject only to local regulation i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc. Travel is not a privilege requiring licensing, vehicle registration, or forced insurances.”

Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 169 N.E. 22. “Traffic infractions are not a crime.” People v. Battle “Persons faced with an unconstitutional licensing law which purports to require a license as a prerequisite to exercise of right… may ignore the law and engage with impunity in exercise of such right.”

Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham 394 U.S. 147 (1969). U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 3 “The word ‘operator’ shall not include any person who solely transports his own property and who transports no persons or property for hire or compensation.”

Statutes at Large California Chapter 412 p.83 “Highways are for the use of the traveling public, and all have the right to use them in a reasonable and proper manner; the use thereof is an inalienable right of every citizen.” Escobedo v. State 35 C2d 870 in 8 Cal Jur 3d p.27 “RIGHT — A legal RIGHT, a constitutional RIGHT means a RIGHT protected by the law, by the constitution, but government does not create the idea of RIGHT or original RIGHTS; it acknowledges them. . . “ Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1914, p. 2961. “Those who have the right to do something cannot be licensed for what they already have right to do as such license would be meaningless.”

City of Chicago v Collins 51 NE 907, 910. “A license means leave to do a thing which the licensor could prevent.” Blatz Brewing Co. v. Collins, 160 P.2d 37, 39; 69 Cal. A. 2d 639. “The object of a license is to confer a right or power, which does not exist without it.”

Payne v. Massey (19__) 196 SW 2nd 493, 145 Tex 273. “The court makes it clear that a license relates to qualifications to engage in profession, business, trade or calling; thus, when merely traveling without compensation or profit, outside of business enterprise or adventure with the corporate state, no license is required of the natural individual traveling for personal business, pleasure and transportation.”

Wingfield v. Fielder 2d Ca. 3d 213 (1972). “If [state] officials construe a vague statute unconstitutionally, the citizen may take them at their word, and act on the assumption that the statute is void.” –

Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham 394 U.S. 147 (1969). “With regard particularly to the U.S. Constitution, it is elementary that a Right secured or protected by that document cannot be overthrown or impaired by any state police authority.” Donnolly vs. Union Sewer Pipe Co., 184 US 540; Lafarier vs. Grand Trunk R.R. Co., 24 A. 848; O’Neil vs. Providence Amusement Co., 108 A. 887. “The right to travel (called the right of free ingress to other states, and egress from them) is so fundamental that it appears in the Articles of Confederation, which governed our society before the Constitution.”

(Paul v. Virginia). “[T]he right to travel freely from State to State … is a right broadly assertable against private interference as well as governmental action. Like the right of association, it is a virtually unconditional personal right, guaranteed by the Constitution to us all.” (U.S. Supreme Court,

Shapiro v. Thompson). EDGERTON, Chief Judge: “Iron curtains have no place in a free world. …’Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal liberty, and the right, ordinarily, of free transit from or through the territory of any State is a right secured by the Constitution.’

Williams v. Fears, 179 U.S. 270, 274, 21 S.Ct. 128, 45 L.Ed. 186. “Our nation has thrived on the principle that, outside areas of plainly harmful conduct, every American is left to shape his own life as he thinks best, do what he pleases, go where he pleases.” Id., at 197.

Kent vs. Dulles see Vestal, Freedom of Movement, 41 Iowa L.Rev. 6, 13—14. “The validity of restrictions on the freedom of movement of particular individuals, both substantively and procedurally, is precisely the sort of matter that is the peculiar domain of the courts.” Comment, 61 Yale L.J. at page 187. “a person detained for an investigatory stop can be questioned but is “not obliged to answer, answers may not be compelled, and refusal to answer furnishes no basis for an arrest.”Justice White, Hiibel “Automobiles have the right to use the highways of the State on an equal footing with other vehicles.”

Cumberland Telephone. & Telegraph Co. v Yeiser 141 Kentucy 15. “Each citizen has the absolute right to choose for himself the mode of conveyance he desires, whether it be by wagon or carriage, by horse, motor or electric car, or by bicycle, or astride of a horse, subject to the sole condition that he will observe all those requirements that are known as the law of the road.”

Swift v City of Topeka, 43 U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 4 Kansas 671, 674. The Supreme Court said in U.S. v Mersky (1960) 361 U.S. 431: An administrative regulation, of course, is not a “statute.” A traveler on foot has the same right to use of the public highway as an automobile or any other vehicle.

Cecchi v. Lindsay, 75 Atl. 376, 377, 1 Boyce (Del.) 185. Automotive vehicles are lawful means of conveyance and have equal rights upon the streets with horses and carriages.

Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 205; See also: Christy v. Elliot, 216 Ill. 31; Ward v. Meredith, 202 Ill. 66; Shinkle v. McCullough, 116 Ky. 960; Butler v. Cabe, 116 Ark. 26, 28-29. …automobiles are lawful vehicles and have equal rights on the highways with horses and carriages. Daily v. Maxwell, 133 S.W. 351, 354.

Matson v. Dawson, 178 N.W. 2d 588, 591. A farmer has the same right to the use of the highways of the state, whether on foot or in a motor vehicle, as any other citizen.

Draffin v. Massey, 92 S.E.2d 38, 42. Persons may lawfully ride in automobiles, as they may lawfully ride on bicycles. Doherty v. Ayer, 83 N.E. 677, 197 Mass. 241, 246;

Molway v. City of Chicago, 88 N.E. 485, 486, 239 Ill. 486; Smiley v. East St. Louis Ry. Co., 100 N.E. 157, 158. “A soldier’s personal automobile is part of his ‘household goods[.]’

U.S. v Bomar, C.A.5(Tex.), 8 F.3d 226, 235” 19A Words and Phrases – Permanent Edition (West) pocket part 94. “[I]t is a jury question whether … an automobile … is a motor vehicle[.]”

United States v Johnson, 718 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir. 1983). Other right to use an automobile cases: –

EDWARDS VS. CALIFORNIA, 314 U.S. 160 –

TWINING VS NEW JERSEY, 211 U.S. 78 – WILLIAMS VS. FEARS, 179 U.S. 270, AT 274 – CRANDALL VS. NEVADA, 6 WALL. 35, AT 43-44 – THE PASSENGER CASES, 7 HOWARD 287, AT 492 – U.S. VS. GUEST, 383 U.S. 745, AT 757-758 (1966) –

GRIFFIN VS. BRECKENRIDGE, 403 U.S. 88, AT 105-106 (1971) – CALIFANO VS. TORRES, 435 U.S. 1, AT 4, note 6 –

SHAPIRO VS. THOMPSON, 394 U.S. 618 (1969) – CALIFANO VS. AZNAVORIAN, 439 U.S. 170, AT 176 (1978) Look the above citations up in American Jurisprudence

—————————————————————————

December 26, 1933 49 Statute 3097 Treaty Series 881 ( Convention on Rights and Duties of States ) stated CONGRESS replaced STATUTES with international law, placing all STATES under international law.

December 9, 1945, the International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of United States to United Nations.

22 CFR 92.12-92.31 FR Heading “Foreign Relationship” states that an oath is required to take office.

Title 8 USC 1481 states once an oath of office is taken, citizenship is relinquished, thus one becomes a foreign entity, agency, or state. That means every public office is a foreign state, including all political subdivisions. (i.e. every single court is considered a separate foreign entity).

Title 22 USC (Foreign relations and Intercourse) Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents.

Title 28 USC 3002 Section 15A states United States is a Federal Corporation and not a government, including the Judicial Procedural Section.

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 4j states that the Court jurisdiction and immunity fall under a foreign state.

The 11th Amendment states “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of a Foreign State.” (A foreign entity, agency, or state cannot bring any suit against a United States citizen without abiding the following procedure.)

Title 22 CFR 93.1-93.2 states that the Department of State has to be notified of any suit, and in turn has to notify the United States citizen of said suit.

Title 28 USC 1330states that the United States District Court has to grant permission for the suit to be pursued once the court has been supplied sufficient proof that the United States citizen is actually a corporate entity.

Title 28 USC 1608 One has Absolute Immunity as a Corporation.

Title 28 USC 1602-1611 ( Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act ) allows the jurisdiction of a court to be challenged, and a demand of proper jurisdiction to be stated.

July 27, 1868, 15 Statutes at Large Chapter 249 Section 1 “Acts Concerning American Citizens in a Foreign State,” expatriation, is what is broken when jurisdiction is demanded, and is not met with an answer.

Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12b 6, the prosecution has failed to provide adequate proof that the parties involved in this situation are actually corporate entities. There is ample proof that the prosecution and other agents are actually corporations.

In 1950, the 81st Congress investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined that the B.A.R. Association is founded and run by communists under definition. Thus, any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R. will only be loyal to the B.A.R. and not the people.

In 1933, elected officials and the alleged “country” have been given to the United Nations Government system. Under Senator Barack Hussein Obama’s Bill, SB2433, the Poverty Act of 2007, the UN military forces can step on American soil to confiscate weapons from U.S. citizens. Under the Bush Administration, B.A.R. Attorney General Ashcroft and Haliburton established FEMA Concentration Camps for U.S. citizens who refuse the new world order/one world government.

“That the Pan American treaty of 12-26-1933 (49 STAT 3097) Treaty Series 881 – (Convention on Rights and Duties of States) stated CONGRESS replaced STATUTES with international law, placing all states under international law.

That the International Organization Immunities Act of 12-9-1945 – – Congress relinquished every public office over to the UN. Local governments up to the president fall under UN jurisdiction. Congress gave the UN the right to dictate what laws will be international & gave them the right to tax the States.

That the International Reorganization Rescind Act- Congress put this into form but they never took action to rescind the act. Fairly recently an Ohio judge filed suit claiming that Congress did not have the right to relinquish government authority over to the UN (a corporation or foreign country) and that the Congressional act was a constitutional violation because they didn’t put it to the States or the people to agree on it. In 2005 the US Supreme court declined to hear the case therefore all public offices are under UN jurisdiction & they are not American Citizens.

That the Oath of Office – Title 5 USC 331, 332, 333 backed up by Title 22 CFR Foreign Relations 92.12 – 92.31 and Title 8 USC, section 1481 – the public official relinquishes his national citizenship and are thus foreign agents as stipulated under Title 22 USC, chapter 11, section 611, loss of national citizenship – Public officials are no longer US Citizens, but rather are foreign agents and must register as such.

That Title 8 USC 1481 stated once an oath of office is taken citizenship is relinquished, thus you become a foreign entity, agency, or state. That means every public office is a foreign state, including all political subdivisions. (i.e. every single court is considered a separate foreign entity).

That Title 22 USC (Foreign Relations and Intercourse) Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents.

Title 28 USC 3002 Section 15A states that the United States is a Federal Corporation and not a Government, including the Judiciary Procedural Section.

That the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 4j states that the Court jurisdiction and immunity fall under a foreign State.

That 28 USC CHAPTER 176 – FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE.
The Federal Debt Collection Procedure places all courts under equity and commerce and under the International Monetary Fund.”

” Step right up, Ladies and Gentlemen!!! And witness two of the most epic chess games

ever played in history.”

So, let us begin with Board @1.

At this table, is the ever-so-lovely,swave and deboner(?), Donald Trump  the “Donald!!!

On the opposite side of the board, we have the fierce, do-anything-kill-anybody-but-we-will-win! kinda guys. These are well seasoned competitors, loaded with a whole arsenal of Babylonian Word/Money Magick in their back pockets. Like an Achilles’s Heal, if you happen to knock them on their butts. that disables all the tools in their back pocket.

Ya’ see, heah, the Donald basically owns them all. Literally. In a corporate world, in a corporate political world (the UNITED STATES,INC.), the Donald is the perfect President/CEO for said corporation. He is successful, and at times he had failures (which are all on public record), he is a man who is very savvy in using money, while having  a grasp of “their” media,that far outstrips their knowledge (or power to control).

Oops! This is a tragedy! The Emperor has no voice!!!

Add to this, he’s an entrepreneur who has designed a masterful multimedia, political Ad campaign, and the GOP can’t shut off his finances because they aren’t supplying any! If anything, the shoe is on the other foot. They are all in corporate “bonding” and obligation to him through large political donations, and they have been reminded of it. Oops, Again!

Yes, the action is tense at this side of the room as the Donald! continues to counter his opponent with planned, practiced ease.

And Noooow, Board Number 2!!!

Ladies and gentlemen, allow me to introduce the challengers for 2016,

Playing the White chess pieces, we have “Vladimir Putin!!! (The Russian Bear)”

are well known as not only a master chess players, but as very strong leader, in most ways a brilliant tactician, who is smart enough, and practical enough, to surround himself with no fools These are RUSSIANS, through and through. They believe in Mother country and that which will benefit her. He garners the support of over 89% of the Russian people. That is a LOT of Russians!

With his opponents (in black) we have an opponent that has been the long-standing champion. There are many hopes riding on the overturn of the champs.

This battle has been ongoing for several years now, but Vladimir is continuing incursions into the territory of…. Wait a minute. Let’s stop here and see if we can endeavor to try to begin to focus on finding out…

Who is They?

Wow! Have you ever tried wrapping your mouth around a box of rocks?! They say Plato did it whenever he orated a speech, (I’m pretty sure it was Plato). It would take several pages of listing all of the names for They.”

At the top, we have an elite. This includes the ultra-rich gang-banksters. These boys know their shit. They are “destined” to rule. They know how and all us little peasants are just here to serve them. They are called things like The Cabal, The Illuminati, The New World Order, the Catholic See, The Crown, mostly the powers and major governments of the Western world, and their Brute squad, NATO … I digress downhill, going along the course of other forms of shit.

These are the folks that invented Monopoly and have been playing it for several hundred years. Only now, the game is chess! Here they are waving their petro-dollar-world-reserve-currency game in his faces and he’s looking at them goin “So what, get on the board fellas, and let’s play. I have my own money game, backed by tangible assets.”

In conclusion, for now, things are heating up quickly, and the odds are not looking too good for the Dark Side boys. Unfortunately, Vladimir is another one of those media savvy (KGB trained), business-wise, well advised leaders, and so far, he is coming to dominate the board.

We will be keeping a close eye on these two epic matches, and update you as updates become available.

Bye for now.

I have been very absent, and I apologize.

I have been watching the world go through so many changes. It is truly a very interesting time on Earth these days.

First, and I believe foremost, is the result of the biggest mistake ever made by the elite, and their tech. puppet DARPA. They let the internet get in to the hands of the public. I believe that we have THE most informed global population the world has ever seen.

With so much access to information, especially that which The Powers That BE (TPTB) are so afraid to see get out. Their “dirty little secrets, dirty little lies,” (thank you Don Henley), are being outed at every turn. The common swear phrase in DC has become “Dammit, that document went viral on the damned net!” And once it’s out there, they never seem to get control of it again… Oops!

Also, the digitizing of all the laws, and their stautory “color of law,” it has become a matter of course for people to go through them and find the hidden remedies in them, that are there because of the rule of law. Any law that demands action or compensation on your part, has to, by law, provide remedy.

Here is an example of a man who went through the IRS tax codes, and discovered that about 95% of tax paying Americans are not actually required to pay the tax. Not only that, they are all due a refund, since they paid under threat, duress, and coercion, which automatically voids all contracts. Yet another Oops! The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code

I am amazed daily at the crazed and inept insanity of the Obama international game.He and his masters are grasping at the last straws of power, which is slipping from their grip much faster than they planned. They have gotten themselves into too many wars and conspiracies with the services of the CIA, and they all suffer from, psychiatrically speaking, a military/industrial complex, wrapped aroung money and power.

They (TPTB) forgot, I think, to take into the equation, the exponential growth of knowledge and awareness that is taking place on Earth. And to add to their woes, Obama is seen as pitted against Vladimir Putin, a fierce and genius international chess player. Obama is barely playing checkers. Oh well, that’s what King O gets for listening to Valerie Jarret, and Hillary Clinton. I am so glad I am not him.

I have deemed what is going on as “A Revolution of Consciousness,” and it is in full swing. I believe it will help limit the amount of violence and bloodshed in getting the old powers out, and a new social paradigm in place, based on cooperation, for the good of all; versus competition, I win, you lose, no matter what.

Sooo… I have gotten a good start (as the title of the blog states), on my opinion of what’s going on. You are free to disagree. If I have said anything, or say anything in the future that you disagree with, or makes you uneasy, I invite you (before you comment), to do some research and see if you can find some credible info that disputes it, I will listen, and if I am wrong, I will admit it.

Suffice it to say that I have validated my opinions with hours of research, and talking to people from all over the world, basically questioning everything. I do not offer my opinions lightly.

For now, I will say peace be with you, have a wonderful day, week, life, all of the above.

Namaste

The Blue Wizard

Whew!

What an amazing time it is in this world, and country.

It is becoming almost impossible to keep up with all the scandals that have arisen in the U.S., from the birther issue to the IRS scandal, Benghazi, immigration, election fraud, gun control false-flags. Seems that everything our government and authority figures are doing that is wrong, is being outed by “whistle-blowers.” And it’s about time.

Many people, actually, thousands, are waking up every day to see something new, that effects their life in one way or another. It reminds me of the movie “Network,” with their slogan, “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it anymore.”

“We the People” are becoming furious with our government’s blatant disregard for us as Human Beings, and the in-a-lien-able rights that we each possess.

Our current “Public Servant #1 seems to have forgotten everything he supposedly learned, claiming to be a Constitutional lawyer, and is doing everything in his power to circumvent the Constitution, while defending his right to even be and American citizen, let alone to serve as the president.

And make no mistake, he is not the Constitutional “President for the united States,” but rather is the president/CEO of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Inc. This is a foreign corporation, located in an independant sovereign nation/state called Washington, D(on’t) C(are).

Last count I took, there are only 50 States, and D.C. is not on that list. According to the Act of 1871, DC is a ten-square mile (logic free zone) area, and it has its own laws and its own Constitution (Articles of Incorporation). Its jurisdiction is limited to that area, and the “corporate citizens” who live there.

Unless you voluntarily consent to become one of them, they have no jurisdiction over the “Sovereign People” of the several united States. Have you signed a statement lately, asking if you are a “citizen of the United States?” If you answered yes, and signed at the bottom of the form, you just consented to following their laws, and have abrogated your Constitutionally guaranteed inalienable rights.

They don’t tell your this before signing their contract, and all government business is “contract law,” all the way from a traffic ticket, to the Constitution. The light at the end of the tunnel is that you have the lawful right of recission. Since the terms of their contracts are never fully disclosed, and since there is no mutual benefit to these contracts, they are null and void.

A simple “Notice of Mistake” stating that you were never fully advised of all the terms of said contract, and you would not have signed had you known, and stating that you hereby remove your consent and cancel all illegitimate contracts can pull you out of the contract. This is one method.

Another that has been given us, and is now being fully exploited by “the People” is that of the Common Law Grand Jury. We are guaranteed the right to a speedy trial by a jury of our peers, and with the decision of the Supreme Court, our right was guaranteed.

In a stunning 6 to 3 decision Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, confirmed that the American grand jury is neither part of the judicial, executive nor legislative branches of government, but instead belongs to the people. It is in effect a fourth branch of government “governed” and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its authority emanates from the Bill of Rights, see United States -v- Williams.

Here is a way you can begin to take back our country and the courts, as well as bring corrupt public officials to the trial they have earned. Fro the sake of your own well-being, those of your family’s, and those of your community, please visit the National Liberty Alliance, and consider becoming a Jurist. So far (7/1/2014) 22 States have constituted the Common Law Grand Jury in all counties of their state. We need all 3142 counties, (1200 to date), in all 50 states to take back America. (Update: all American counties have been reconstituted under this project, 11-3-2015) Please consider joining us.

I know… I have been absent for quite some time. My apologies.

I took up a sort of vendetta on Facebook. I am not going to link to it, because it is something totally separate, and I am not there, who I am here. Suffice it to say that I have been doing my shit-disturbing best to wake people up. It has been frustrating, to say the least, but I actually feel as though I am accomplishing something. 

Many early antagonists have turned the corner, and instead of arguing, are starting to ask intelligent questions, and (God forbid!), even doing some research on their own. They have been augmenting my arguments, while those who will not wake up only validate my arguments.

Needless to say, as things are heating up in the government, my rantings have been a lot more radical, and the disagreements a bit more severe, but cognitive dissonance is a powerful emotion, and those waking up must go through it. After the initial shock wears off, I try to guide them in a direction that will ease them more into their awakening process. Considering the many things I have read and seen, I fear that if I put out too much, I will run into people that, as Morpheus explains to NEO, “There are just some that cannot be unplugged [their heads would explode].” My emphasis.

I do have a solution that I would like to to seriously consider, if you would… I have recently discovered and become involved with a group called The National Liberty Alliance. Their mission is the establishment of a Citizens Grand Jury (CGJ) in every county of the united States; over 3100 of them. Judge Scalia of the Supreme Court recently ruled that the CGJs have legal standing under the Fifth Amendment of the Bill of Rights, as a separate branch of government, not attached to the three main branches, and made up of the people. It takes 25 people in each county to make up a jury, and a total of 25 to establish the CGJs as part of the States’ governments.

There are introductory videos on the front page, and there is a complete tutorial on the duties and responsibilities of a Citizen Juror. It is a powerful position, and only for those with the concept of true Freedom and Justice in their hearts. If you are committed to restoring this country to what it is supposed to be, a Constitutional Republic, the CGJs, the militias, the Constitutional Sheriffs, the Oathkeepers, and veterans such as myself are the hopes for restoring the country we were brought up to believe in.

I took an oath in 1969 to “protect and defend the Constitution, from all enemies, foreign and domestic.” That oath did not expire upon my discharge from the military. I WILL stand and defend my home, my family, my community, my state, and my country. I will not let a tyrannical government destroy what the founding fathers gave so much to create.